Recent discussions around the use of the National Security Act (NSA) and stricter arrests have sparked debates over the balance between civil liberties and security. Critics argue that applying such measures in sensitive tribal or border areas could infringe on fundamental rights and affect local communities disproportionately. Supporters, however, maintain that these steps are necessary to maintain law and order and protect national interests in regions prone to unrest. Experts emphasize the importance of careful implementation and transparent oversight to ensure that security measures do not come at the expense of citizens’ rights. Striking the right balance between maintaining safety and preserving civil liberties is a challenge policymakers continue to grapple with, especially in areas where cultural, social, and political sensitivities run high. #CivilLiberties #NationalSecurityAct #RightsVsSecurity #BorderRegions #TribalAreas #IndiaPolitics #LawAndOrder #HumanRights #SecurityMeasures #CivicDebate