Anand Ranganathan Defends Dhurandhar: 'Criticism Is Selective, Success Faces Scrutiny' Anand Ranganathan has publicly defended the film Dhurandhar, arguing that criticism of the movie is often selective and that success inevitably draws intense scrutiny. In a sharp and unapologetic statement, Ranganathan compared the film's reception to global cinema and political narratives, suggesting that critics frequently blur the line between fact and fiction based on ideological biases. He drew parallels with films like Titanic, Gandhi, and Schindler's List, questioning the logic behind labeling certain stories as "fiction" when they are rooted in real events. Ranganathan also addressed narratives surrounding films like Kashmir Files and Kerala Files, emphasizing that the focus on ideological bias undermines the credibility of such critiques. The filmmaker highlighted that success, particularly in a politically charged environment, invites heightened scrutiny and "psychoanalysis." He argued that the film's widespread attention has led to a disproportionate amount of criticism, much of which is not grounded in objective analysis. Ranganathan’s remarks come amid a broader debate over the film’s portrayal of sensitive historical and social issues, with some critics accusing it of being propagandistic. However, he maintained that the film’s intent is to reflect reality rather than fabricate narratives. The discussion around Dhurandhar has sparked a wider conversation about the role of cinema in addressing contentious topics. Ranganathan’s defense underscores the tension between artistic expression and political accountability, as well as the challenges of navigating public perception in a polarized climate.#dhurandhar #anand_ranganathan #kashmir_files #kerala_files #global_cinema
