COEMPT Shield Cracks as Former NU Exam Operator Testifies Data Transfer Was in 'Machine Readable' Format A significant development emerged during the ongoing inquiry into examination irregularities at Nagpur University (NU), where the controversial exam service provider, COEMPT EduTeck Pvt Ltd, faced scrutiny over its alleged role in the 2025 winter and summer examination disruptions. During a hearing before a three-member probe panel led by NU senate member Manmohan Bajpai, representatives of the former examination handler, Promarc Technologies Pvt Ltd, testified that student data for 3.17 lakh students was transferred to COEMPT through the university’s IT cell. This claim directly contradicts the NU administration’s earlier assertion that Promarc failed to provide data in the required format, leading to glitches in the exams. Promarc officials stated that data transfer occurred via multiple methods, including CDs, hard copies, soft copies, and email communications, all formatted in universal Excel sheets. They emphasized that the data was provided in a "machine readable format," which they argued should have been sufficient for COEMPT to process. Promarc’s representatives also challenged the university’s claim that the data transfer was incomplete, asserting that the IT cell’s responsibility was to verify the data before forwarding it to the new firm. The IT cell, however, maintained that it did not check the datasets, leaving the responsibility of data integrity with Promarc. The NU vice-chancellor, Manali Kshirsagar, acknowledged the claims but noted that the statements made before the inquiry panel require technical verification by the university’s IT cell and experts.#nagpur_university #manali_kshirsagar #manmohan_bajpai #coempt_eduteck_pvt_ltd #promarc_technologies_pvt_ltd
Tender Rigging Allegations Emerge in Nagpur University Contract Probe Nagpur University is under scrutiny for alleged tender rigging and mismanagement of exams after a probe panel launched an investigation into the controversial contract awarded to Coempt Eduteck Pvt Ltd, a Hyderabad-based firm linked to the CBSE’s on-screen marking controversy. The inquiry focuses on whether eligibility norms were manipulated to favor the company, which was granted a Rs 5-crore, three-year contract to manage exams and results. The panel is examining claims that technical requirements were altered to create an uneven playing field, despite allegations that the firm, previously known as Globarena Technologies, had faced blacklisting by institutions in southern India. Key changes under review include a reduction in the minimum experience requirement for handling exams from three lakh students to two lakh, a halving of the digital valuation centers needed from 200 screens to 100, and a fivefold increase in the minimum annual turnover from Rs 5 crore to Rs 25 crore. A senior panel member questioned the university’s justification for these adjustments, pointing out that the institution lacked its own server infrastructure or data center, raising doubts about its ability to manage results for over three lakh students. “Why would results of over three lakh students get botched up if the university had the capacity to handle such a workload?” the member asked, highlighting inconsistencies in the university’s rationale. The tender process faced legal challenges when former exam contractor Promarc Software Pvt Ltd contested the revised eligibility criteria in court, arguing the changes were crafted to exclude competitors.#hyderabad #cbse #bombay_high_court #nagpur_university #coempt_eduteck_pvt_ltd
NSUI seeks probe into 600 pending NU exam results Nagpur: With more than 600 examination results still pending, the National Students Union of India (NSUI) on Saturday accused Nagpur University of serious administrative lapses and irregularities, claiming the delay is jeopardizing the academic prospects of thousands of students. At a press conference, NSUI representatives alleged that the university’s vice-chancellor had failed to address repeated complaints and instead misled students and the media by avoiding corrective action. The students’ organization stated that multiple letters highlighting grievances had been sent between December 2025 and March 2026, but none received a response. Among the key demands, NSUI called for an immediate inquiry into alleged illegal activities within the university campus. It also sought a fair investigation into the eligibility and experience of Coempt Eduteck Pvt Ltd, the agency contracted for examination-related work. While an inquiry committee was initially promised, it was not constituted, the organization said. NSUI further demanded regular audits of university funds and fees collected from students to prevent misuse and potential financial irregularities. The students’ body pointed out that several key positions, including the pro-vice-chancellor, heads of departments, faculty members, and other administrative roles, remain vacant. This vacancy, they argued, is undermining governance and academic functioning. The NSUI’s allegations underscore growing frustration among students and educators over the university’s inability to manage its administrative responsibilities effectively.#nagpur_university #nsui #coempt_eduteck_pvt_ltd #nagpur_university_vice_chancellor #nagpur_university_pro_vice_chancellor
