Student Loans Must Be Forgiven And Cannot Be Kicked Off SAVE Plan, Says Amended Lawsuit Student loan borrowers have filed an amended lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education, arguing that the agency’s plan to terminate the SAVE repayment program and force borrowers into other repayment options is unlawful. The lawsuit contends that qualifying SAVE plan borrowers should receive loan forgiveness or be transferred to the REPAYE plan, rather than being subjected to other repayment methods. This legal challenge arises as the Education Department prepares to transition millions of borrowers out of the SAVE plan starting in July, following a settlement that ended both SAVE and its predecessor, REPAYE. The department has sought to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that the termination of these programs is final and that current law no longer authorizes them. Despite the ongoing legal battle, borrowers are advised to prepare for selecting new repayment plans, as the department’s timeline for transitioning out of SAVE remains unchanged. The lawsuit, filed by four student loan borrowers, argues that the Education Department’s handling of the SAVE plan’s termination was unlawful. The plaintiffs concede that Congress authorized the termination of SAVE in legislation passed last year, which also phases out other income-driven repayment plans like PAYE and ICR. However, the legislation does not mandate the termination of these programs until 2028. The plaintiffs assert that because there was a period during the litigation when SAVE was not blocked, borrowers who qualify should still be eligible for the program’s benefits, including student loan forgiveness if they met the 20- or 25-year threshold.#save_plan #linda_mcmahon #us_department_of_education #repaye_plan #eighth_circuit_court_of_appeals
‘A Complete Betrayal’: Residents React To Discussion on City Hall’s Future Numerous public speakers expressed opposition to potential plans to vacate Dallas City Hall as repair costs for the historic I.M. Pei-designed building have surged beyond $1 billion. During a two-hour meeting of the City Council Economic Development Committee on Monday, residents and officials debated whether to relocate government operations from the structure to another venue, possibly a leased downtown office building. Many attendees wore “Save Dallas City Hall” pins and raised their hands in silent approval of arguments against the move. The Economic Development Corp. (EDC) report, presented to the City Council Finance Committee in late February, estimated that modernizing and repairing City Hall would require over $1 billion. Some council members have questioned the accuracy of the figures, while Council member Zarin Gracey labeled the building “NOT a functional building” in a recent Facebook post. Proponents of relocation argue that the high costs and the city’s financial strain elsewhere justify the move, citing potential economic growth from redeveloping the site. They also point to rising vacancy rates in downtown Dallas and the impact of AT&T’s planned relocation to Plano. The Finance Committee approved a recommendation to explore relocation and redevelopment options, including moving emergency call centers to a new facility earlier than planned. Monday’s meeting marked the first public comment session on the issue since the EDC report was released on February 20. Jessica Stewart Lenvay, a resident and local architect, criticized the report’s lack of transparency, stating, “This is the people’s house. This is the heart of our city. We need to do more to engage constituents.#dallas_city_hall #zarin_gracey #economic_development_corp #melanie_von_landingham #linda_mcmahon
‘A Complete Betrayal’: Residents React To Discussion on City Hall’s Future Dozens of public speakers voiced opposition to potential plans to vacate Dallas City Hall as repair costs for the I.M. Pei-designed structure have surged beyond $1 billion. Over two hours at the City Council Economic Development Committee meeting, residents and officials debated whether to relocate city operations to another venue, possibly a leased downtown office building. Many attendees wore “Save Dallas City Hall” pins and raised their hands in silent approval of arguments against the move. The Economic Development Corp. (EDC) report, presented to the City Council Finance Committee in late February, projected that modernizing and repairing City Hall would require over $1 billion. While some council members questioned the accuracy of the figures, Council member Zarin Gracey criticized the building as “NOT a functional building” in a recent Facebook post. Proponents of relocation argued that the high costs and the city’s financial strain elsewhere justify the move, while also citing potential economic benefits from redeveloping the site. The Finance Committee voted to recommend exploring relocation and redevelopment options, including moving emergency call centers to a new facility earlier than planned. Monday’s meeting marked the first public comment session since the EDC report’s release on February 20. Jessica Stewart Lenvay, a resident and local architect, called the discussion “embarrassing,” emphasizing that City Hall is “the people’s house” and a “heart of our city.” She urged greater engagement with constituents and more transparency in the process. The EDC report estimated that $345 million would be needed to address critical issues like sprinkler systems, HVAC, the roof, and plumbing.#dallas_city_hall #zarin_gracey #economic_development_corp #melanie_von_landingham #linda_mcmahon
