Delhi High Court Postpones Verdict on Arvind Kejriwal's Recusal Plea in Liquor Policy Case Delhi High Court Judge Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma postponed her verdict on pleas by Arvind Kejriwal and others seeking her recusal in the liquor policy case. Originally scheduled for 2:30 pm, the court delayed its decision to 4:30 pm after accepting Kejriwal’s submission as a written filing. Justice Sharma stated that the court would not alter its procedural rules for any litigant, emphasizing that the recusal matter would be treated as written submissions rather than a formal rejoinder. Kejriwal, appearing in person without legal representation, argued that the registry’s refusal to accept his rejoinder was a “miscarriage of justice.” Justice Sharma acknowledged the court’s earlier leniency in allowing him to file an additional affidavit after the recusal matter had been reserved for orders. She clarified that under registry rules, parties appearing in person must seek permission to file documents, and since the case was not “extraordinary,” the standard procedure was followed. The judge also noted that there is no legal concept of a “rejoinder” to written submissions, and she would ensure Kejriwal’s concerns were addressed through the written record. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the CBI, opposed Kejriwal’s request, asserting that no court in India accepts post-reservation filings. He reiterated that the court should apply standard procedures to all litigants and warned against setting a precedent for unfounded recusal claims. Kejriwal, however, accused Justice Sharma of bias, alleging a “direct conflict of interest” due to her children being empanelled central government lawyers who receive work through the solicitor general.#manish_sisodia #cbi #delhi_high_court #arvind_kejriwal #justice_swarana_kanta_sharma
Delhi High Court to Hear CBI's Challenge Against Discharge of Liquor Policy Case Accused The Delhi High Court is set to address a plea filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) challenging the trial court's decision to discharge all accused in the liquor policy case. The case involves prominent AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, among others. A bench led by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma will hear the matter today. Last week, Justice Sharma had raised concerns about the trial court's order, noting that some of its observations appeared prima facie erroneous. This prompted further legal action, as Kejriwal sought to transfer the case to another bench, citing apprehensions of bias against Justice Sharma. However, the High Court rejected his request, leading Kejriwal to file a writ petition in the Supreme Court to transfer the CBI's petition from Justice Sharma's bench. The CBI's plea argues that the trial court's discharge order is flawed and seeks to overturn it. The case has drawn significant attention due to the high-profile nature of the accused and the potential implications for the legal proceedings. The court's decision on this matter could set a precedent for similar cases involving political figures and public officials. Live updates from the hearing will provide further insights into the court's reasoning and the potential outcomes. The case remains a focal point for legal and political observers, given its impact on the ongoing investigations and the broader implications for judicial independence and accountability.#manish_sisodia #central_bureau_of_investigation #delhi_high_court #arvind_kejriwal #justice_swarana_kanta_sharma
'Unwarranted': Why Delhi court rapped CBI for 'South Group' tag in liquor policy case A Delhi court discharged former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, manish sisodia and 21 others in the liquor policy case, criticizing the CBI for using the term 'South Group'. The judge stated the label lacked legal basis, was arbitrary, and could prejudice proceedings, urging the agency to use neutral, evidence-based language. #Arvind_Kejriwal #Delhi_court #policy_case #liquor_policy #South_Group #rapped_CBI #minister_Arvind #manish_sisodia #court_rapped #court_discharged
