Supreme Court Declines to Reconsider 98-Year-Old Judge's Suspension Case The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a petition by Judge Pauline Newman, a 98-year-old federal appeals court judge, to resume hearing cases after she was suspended from active service due to concerns about her fitness to serve. Newman, who has been a member of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit since 1984, sought reinstatement following a three-year suspension ordered by the circuit’s Judicial Council. The court’s chief judge, Kimberly Moore, had previously warned Newman that her health issues and habitual delays posed a risk to the efficient administration of justice. Newman’s career on the Federal Circuit, established in 1982 to handle appeals in specialized areas such as international trade, patents, trademarks, veterans’ benefits, and government money claims, spanned over four decades. During this time, she authored more than 300 dissenting opinions, earning her the moniker “the Great Dissenter.” However, her tenure faced scrutiny after Moore suspended her in 2021, citing health concerns and delays. The suspension was initially ordered following a complaint that highlighted Newman’s inability to manage her workload, including a fainting episode in 2022 and prior health issues in 2021. Moore and a special committee of two Federal Circuit judges conducted an investigation into Newman’s fitness to continue serving. The panel required Newman to undergo neurological and neuropsychological testing, submit medical records, and participate in an interview. Despite these measures, Newman refused to retire or accept senior status, leading Moore to issue an order identifying a judicial complaint against her.#u_s_supreme_court #new_civil_liberties_alliance #judge_pauline_newman #kimberly_moore #u_s_court_of_appeals_for_the_federal_circuit
98-year-old federal judge suspended for mental fitness appeals to Supreme Court Pauline Newman, a 98-year-old federal appeals judge suspended by her colleagues over concerns about her mental fitness, has asked the Supreme Court to step into her fight to resume hearing cases, her lawyers said Thursday. Three years ago, Newman’s fellow judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit prevented her from taking on new cases indefinitely. Newman has sued them, arguing it’s unconstitutional. The years-long battle has given a glimpse into how the judicial system grapples with issues of age on the bench, at a time when questions about elected officials’ mental fitness is looming large in Washington. Newman rejects the notion she is unfit to serve, and she wants the Supreme Court to reverse a ruling that barred judicial review of her suspension. “Other judges who are watching what is happening to Judge Newman can only wonder if a similar fate will befall them if they fail to stay on the good side of their chief judge,” her petition reads. It has not yet been docketed. The Hill received a copy from Newman’s lawyers. The justices will review the request at a closed-door conference in the upcoming months. The high court chooses what cases it hears, and it turns away the vast majority without comment. Then-President Reagan nominated Newman to the newly created Federal Circuit in 1984. It hears appeals on specialty topics, such as intellectual property and government contracts. Newman became especially known for her opinions on patent law, earning her the nickname of the “Great Dissenter.” The Constitution guarantees federal judges their position and salary for life, unless they’re impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.#supreme_court #federal_circuit #pauline_newman #judicial_conduct_and_disability_act #new_civil_liberties_alliance
