Calcutta High Court Questions Election Commission Over Professor Appointments in West Bengal Elections The Calcutta High Court has raised serious concerns about the Election Commission’s decision to appoint university professors as polling officers for the 2026 West Bengal assembly elections. The court, led by Justice Krishna Rao, challenged the commission’s authority to include academics in electoral duties, citing potential disruptions to educational institutions. The controversy stems from a legal challenge filed by a group of professors who argue that their involvement in election work would compromise their academic responsibilities. The Election Commission initially issued a directive allowing professors to serve as polling officers, a move that sparked immediate backlash from the academic community. Professors claimed the directive would force them to leave their campuses during election periods, disrupting teaching and research. They argued that the commission’s decision lacked legal justification and violated the principle of academic freedom. The court, during a hearing on April 16, 2026, questioned the commission’s rationale, emphasizing that the directive appeared arbitrary and lacked clear guidelines. Justice Rao criticized the commission for its inconsistent approach, noting that the same directive had been issued without prior consultation with stakeholders. He pointed out that the commission’s own notice allowed for the inclusion of judges as polling officers, yet it failed to address the unique challenges faced by academics. The judge also highlighted the potential consequences of the directive, warning that it could set a dangerous precedent for the involvement of professionals in electoral processes.#west_bengal #supreme_court #election_commission #calcutta_high_court #professors
