HC Slams Nagpur University Over Botched Exam and Result Process The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on Tuesday launched a sharp critique of Nagpur University, accusing it of widespread mismanagement in its examination and result processing systems. The court directed the university registrar to explain why an independent committee should not be appointed to investigate the alleged lapses. The proceedings were part of a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by student activist Neeraj Dharashivkar, which highlighted systemic failures in the university’s administrative processes. During the hearing, vacation judge Justice Rajnish Vyas emphasized that the court could not remain passive when the issue affected students’ lives. He noted that newspaper reports and submitted evidence suggested serious flaws in the university’s examination administration. The PIL alleged that over 600 exams were conducted before Diwali 2025, but nearly 70% of results remained pending beyond the prescribed timeline, disrupting admissions, degree certifications, and placement opportunities. The university had previously claimed only 1.4% of results were delayed, a figure the court deemed inconsistent with the evidence. Amicus curiae Bhushan Mohta presented further discrepancies, citing glaring errors in marksheets issued by the university. He referenced reports from The Times of India and other media outlets, noting that "glaring mistakes were noted in the marks awarded column of the mark lists." The judge also raised concerns about allegations that the subject "audit" was incorrectly listed in the BSc eighth semester examination, despite not being part of the curriculum. Mohta argued that the scale of errors was so vast that listing them individually would require multiple pages.#times_of_india #bombay_high_court #nagpur_university #neeraj_dharashivkar #promarc_software_pvt_ltd
