Supreme Court Dismisses Ravi Nair's Defamation Plea in Adani Case The Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected a petition filed by journalist Ravi Nair, who had sought to challenge a defamation case registered against him by the Gujarat crime branch. The case stems from an article co-authored by Nair and Pransh Verma for The Washington Post, which questioned the state-run Life Insurance Corporation’s (LIC) reported investments in the Adani group despite U.S. indictments against billionaire Gautam Adani and his son Sagar Adani. The article, titled “India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s Moghul ally after US charge,” alleged that the LIC had invested in Adani group stocks despite allegations of fraud and bribery against the business tycoon and his executives. The court bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, questioned senior advocate Anand Grover, who represented Nair, about the legal basis for the petition. The bench emphasized that Nair’s plea under Article 32 of the Constitution, which allows individuals to approach the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights, was not the appropriate route. Instead, the court directed Nair to file his petition under Article 226, which pertains to the High Court’s jurisdiction. The justices stated, “Why Article 32 petition? Go to the high court,” highlighting the procedural misstep in the case. The Gujarat crime branch had summoned Nair on February 12, requiring him to appear before a court on February 19. However, the Supreme Court bench ruled that the issues raised in the case could be addressed in the High Court. Nair’s legal team had sought protection from coercive actions until the case was transferred to the High Court, but the bench denied this request, noting that Nair could electronically file his petition.#supreme_court_of_india #ravi_nair #pransh_verma #gautam_adani #sagar_adani
Supreme Court Refuses to Intervene in Journalist's Petition Against Ahmedabad Crime Branch Notice The Supreme Court has declined to intervene in a petition filed by journalist Ravi Nair, who challenged a summons notice issued by the Ahmedabad Crime Branch. The notice, dated February 12, was linked to an article co-authored by Nair titled “India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s mogul ally after U.S. charges,” published in The Washington Post. The court directed Nair’s legal team to approach the Gujarat High Court instead of the Supreme Court. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta permitted Nair to withdraw his petition without addressing his oral request for protection against potential coercive actions. The petitioner, represented by senior advocate Anand Grover and advocate Paras Nath Singh, argued that the notice aimed to criminalize journalistic work conducted in good faith and in the public interest. The petition claimed the article revealed how Indian officials drafted a proposal in May 2025 to channel approximately $3.9 billion in investments to Adani Group businesses from the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), a state-owned entity responsible for life insurance for poor and rural families. Nair’s legal team asserted that the February 12 notice sought to criminalize his reporting, which was based on internal documents from LIC and the Indian Department of Financial Services (DFS), interviews with officials, and insights from three Indian bankers. All sources spoke anonymously due to fears of professional retaliation. The petition emphasized that Nair and his co-author had followed due diligence, reviewing documents in line with journalistic standards. They also sought responses from the Adani Group, LIC, DFS, and the Prime Minister’s Office.#supreme_court #adani_group #ahmedabad_crime_branch #ravi_nair #gujarat_high_court
