Marks In Public Recruitment Exams Not Confidential, Can Be Disclosed Under RTI Act Without Third-Party Consent: Allahabad High Court The Allahabad High Court ruled that information regarding marks obtained by candidates in public recruitment exams is not classified as confidential data. This means such details can be disclosed under the Right to Information Act, 2005, without requiring the consent of third parties, such as exam authorities or institutions. The bench, comprising Justice Ajit Kumar and Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi, emphasized that the marks of individual candidates fall under the scope of public information. The court’s decision came in response to a query about whether the RTI applicant’s request for marks would necessitate the approval of third parties. The judgment clarified that the Right to Information Act allows for the disclosure of such data without additional consent, provided it is not exempt under specific provisions. The ruling underscores the transparency expected in public administrative processes, particularly in examinations conducted by government bodies. The court’s reasoning highlighted that the marks of candidates are part of the public record and are not protected under confidentiality clauses. This interpretation aligns with the broader objective of the RTI Act to promote accountability and openness in governance. The decision may set a precedent for similar cases where public records are sought under the RTI framework. The judgment also addressed the balance between individual privacy and the public’s right to information. While acknowledging the sensitivity of personal data, the court maintained that the disclosure of exam results does not infringe on privacy rights, as it pertains to a public function.#allahabad_high_court #right_to_information_act #justice_ajit_kumar #justice_swarupama_chaturvedi #public_recruitment_exams
