Sukesh Chandrasekhar convicted for posing as Supreme Court Judge, sentencing on August 27 A Delhi court has convicted Sukesh Chandrasekhar, an alleged conman, for impersonating a Supreme Court judge to influence a special judge in a corruption case. The court described the act as a “direct affront” to judicial independence and the sanctity of the legal process. Chandrasekhar, who was in police custody in 2017, used a stolen mobile phone to contact a special judge handling Prevention of Corruption Act cases, falsely claiming to be a Supreme Court judge. The sentencing hearing is scheduled for August 27. The conviction stems from a phone call made on April 28, 2017, during which Chandrasekhar allegedly impersonated the private secretary of a sitting Supreme Court judge and later the judge himself. He sought to persuade the special judge, Poonam Chaudhary, to grant him bail in his corruption case, threatening her with adverse professional consequences if she refused. The court emphasized that the case was not a simple impersonation matter but a deliberate attempt to undermine judicial independence by leveraging the authority of the country’s highest court. Chief Judicial Magistrate Harshita Mishra found Chandrasekhar guilty of offenses under IPC Sections 170 (impersonating a public servant), 189 (threat of injury to a public servant), and 507 (criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication). The court highlighted that the accused used the borrowed authority of a Supreme Court judge to manipulate a judicial officer, which is a grave violation of the legal process. “Justice cannot be entered through the backdoor of impersonation or manufactured authority,” the judge stated.#supreme_court #delhi_court #sukesh_chandrasekhar #poonam_chaudhary #harshita_mishra

Delhi Court Convicts Sukesh Chandrashekhar For Impersonating Supreme Court Judge To Pressurize Judicial Officer To Grant Him Bail A Delhi Court has convicted Sukesh Chandrashekkar for impersonating a Supreme Court judge to pressure a judicial officer overseeing his corruption case into granting him bail. The court found that Chandrashekhar, who was in police custody for a 2017 corruption case, used a constable's mobile phone to contact a judicial officer and falsely claimed to be a Supreme Court judge, threatening the officer with professional consequences if bail was not granted. The court's 121-page order, authored by Chief Judicial Magistrate Harshita Mishra, described the case as a "particularly disturbing instance of an alleged attempt to interfere with the administration of justice." It emphasized that Chandrashekhar allegedly impersonated both the private secretary of a Supreme Court judge and the judge himself, using the authority of the highest judicial body to intimidate the trial judge. The court noted that the accused did not merely make an improper call but sought to "browbeat" the judicial officer into granting bail through a fabricated authority. The court highlighted that the case was qualitatively different from ordinary impersonation or cheating, as it targeted the foundational principles of judicial independence and the sanctity of legal proceedings. It condemned the act as an "egregious inversion of the judicial process," stressing that no individual, regardless of power or influence, could privately command a judge to decide a case in a specific manner.#supreme_court #delhi_court #sukesh_chandrashekhar #chief_judicial_magnitude_harshita_mishra #judicial_officer

साल 2020 के दिल्ली दंगों में आईबी अधिकारी अंकित शर्मा की हत्या और ताहिर हुसैन के दोषी ठहराए जाने की घटना दिल्ली की कड़कड़डूमा कोर्ट ने 13 जुलाई 2026 को घोषणा की कि ताहिर हुसैन और 10 अन्य आरोपियों को अंकित शर्मा की हत्या के मामले में दोषी ठहराया गया है। यह फैसला छह साल के लंबे जांच और अदालत के निर्णय के बाद आया है, जिसमें फॉरेंसिक सबूत, गवाहों के बयान और ट्रायल के आधार पर निर्णय लिया गया। दिल्ली दंगों के दौरान घटना के बारे में विस्तारपूर्वक बताया जाता है। 17-23 फरवरी 2020 के दौरान नागरिकता संशोधन कानून (CAA) के विरोध में उत्तर-पूर्वी दिल्ली में तनाव बढ़ गया। जाफराबाद, मौजपुर, चांदबाग, करावल नगर और खजूरी खास इलाकों में हिंसा भड़क गई। 24 फरवरी को इन इलाकों में पथराव, आगजनी और फायरिंग की घटनाएं रिकॉर्ड की गईं। अंकित शर्मा के परिवार के अनुसार, 25 फरवरी को उन्होंने घर से कुछ घरेलू सामान खरीदने के लिए निकले थे। इसके बाद उनका परिवार उनसे संपर्क नहीं कर सका। अगले दिन उनका शव खजूरी खास नाले से मिला। पोस्टमार्टम रिपोर्ट के अनुसार उनके शरीर पर बड़ी संख्या में चोट और धारदार हथियार के घाव थे। पुलिस ने आरोप लगाया कि उन्हें भीड़ ने घेर लिया, बुरी तरह हमला किया और हत्या के बाद शव नाले में फेंक दिया गया। ताहिर हुसैन के मकान को दंगाइयों का मुख्य ठिकाना माना गया। पुलिस जांच में उस इमारत की छत से बड़ी मात्रा में पत्थर, पेट्रोल बम बनाने की सामग्री, एसिड के पैकेट और गुलेल जैसी वस्तुएं मिली। अभियोजन पक्ष ने इन आधारों पर ताहिर हुसैन को साजिश के प्रमुख आरोपी बताया। चार्जशीट में आरोप लगाया गया कि अंकित शर्मा को सुनियोजित तरीके से निशाना बनाया गया, भीड़ ने उन पर हमला किया और हत्या के बाद शव नाले में फेंक दिया। ताहिर हुसैन ने मुकदमे के दौरान खुद को निर्दोष बताया और कहा कि उन्हें राजनीतिक कारणों से फंसाया गया है। हालांकि, अभियोजन पक्ष ने गवाहों, फॉरेंसिक सबूत और डिजिटल साक्ष्यों के आधार पर अपना मामला रखा, जिसे अदालत ने दोषसिद्धि के लिए पर्याप्त माना। अंतिम सजा का आदेश दोषसिद्धि के बाद अलग से सुनाया जाएगा। इस मामले में अंकित शर्मा के पिता...#delhi_court #dilwali_dangon #ankit_sharma #tahir_husain #caa_2020

दिल्ली कोर्ट ने CBI जॉइंट डायरेक्टर रमनीश और रिटायर्ड पुलिस ऑफिसर वी के पांडे को 2000 में एक रेड के दौरान IRS ऑफिसर अशोक कुमार अग्रवाल के घर में मारपीट और बिना इजाजत घुसने के आरोप में तीन महीने की जेल की सजा सुनाई। ज्यूडिशियल मजिस्ट्रेट शशांक नंदन भट्ट ने दोनों आरोपियों के खिलाफ सजा पर दलीलें सुनीं। रमनीश अभी CBI में जॉइंट डायरेक्टर हैं, जबकि पांडे 2000 में रेड के समय सुपरिटेंडेंट ऑफ पुलिस के तौर पर काम कर रहे थे। कोर्ट ने दोनों आरोपियों के खिलाफ 50,000 रुपए के जुर्माना भी लगाया। मामला 19 अक्टूबर 2000 का है, जब CBI की टीम ने पश्चिम विहार में अग्रवाल के घर पर सर्च और अरेस्ट ऑपरेशन किया था। अग्रवाल ने आरोप लगाया था कि अधिकारी सुबह-सुबह जबरदस्ती उनके घर में घुसे, उन पर हमला किया और अरेस्ट के दौरान कानूनी नियमों का उल्लंघन किया। इस मामले में अग्रवाल के आरोपों की जांच करने के बाद कोर्ट ने आरोपियों को सजा सुनाई। इसके अलावा अपडेट्स में AAP की सांसद स्वाति मालीवाल ने BJP में शामिल होने की घोषणा की। उन्होंने कहा कि वे PM मोदी और गृह मंत्री अमित शाह के काम से प्रेरित होकर BJP में शामिल हुईं। मालीवाल ने AAP और केजरीवाल पर पिछले 10 सालों में मिसमैनेजमेंट और करप्शन के आरोप भी लगाए। AAP नेता मनीष सिसोदिया ने एक्साइज पॉलिसी केस में हाईकोर्ट में पेश होने से इनकार कर दिया। उन्होंने लिखा कि न्याय की उम्मीद नहीं है और सत्याग्रह के अलावा कोई रास्ता नहीं बचा है। तेलंगाना के रंगारेड्डी में क्रेन गिरने से 5 की मौत हो गई, जबकि 11 घायल हो गए। पुलिस ने हादसे के कारणों की जांच शुरू कर दी। फारूक अब्दुल्ला ने आर्टिकल 370 की बहाली को नेशनल कॉन्फ्रेंस का मेन एजेंडा बनाए रखने की घोषणा की। उन्होंने कहा कि जम्मू और कश्मीर के लोगों के अधिकारों के लिए लड़ते रहेंगे। कर्नाटक पर्यटन विभाग ने होमस्टे के नियम सख्त कर दिए, जिसके बाद कोडागु में एक अमेरिकी नागरिक के साथ हुए यौन हमले की घटना के बाद यह कदम उठाया गया। महाराष्ट्र की अदालत ने BJP मंत्री नितेश राणे को 2019 के मामले में एक महीने की जेल की सजा सुनाई, जिसके बाद उनकी सजा निलंबित कर दी गई। अदालत ने कहा कि...#cbi #delhi_court #ramanish #v_k_pande #ashok_kumar_agrawal

Delhi court sentences Kashmiri separatist Asiya Andrabi to life imprisonment A Delhi court on March 24, 2026, sentenced Asiya Andrabi, a prominent Kashmiri separatist and leader of the Dukhtaran-e-Millat group, to life imprisonment for her role in an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) case. The verdict was announced by Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh after the conclusion of the sentencing arguments. Andrabi was convicted for her involvement in activities deemed terrorist under the UAPA, which includes charges related to membership in a terrorist organization and supporting such groups. The court also sentenced two of Andrabi’s associates, Sofi Fehmeeda and Nahida Nasreen, to 30 years in prison for their roles in the same case. The three women were previously convicted on January 14, 2026, under multiple charges, including UAPA Sections 20, 38, and 39, which address membership in terrorist organizations and support for such groups. Additionally, they were found guilty under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for offenses such as promoting enmity between different groups (Section 153A), making imputations prejudicial to national integration (Section 153B), criminal conspiracy (Section 120B), and statements that incite public mischief (Section 505). A separate charge under Section 121A of the IPC, which pertains to conspiracy to commit offenses against the state, was also levied against them. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had previously sought life imprisonment for Andrabi, arguing that her actions constituted a direct threat to national security. The agency emphasized that her alleged efforts to wage war against India necessitated the harshest penalty to deter future acts of conspiracy against the state.#national_investigation_agency #unlawful_activities_prevention_act #asiya_andrabi #delhi_court #dukhtaran_e_millat

Delhi court sentences Asiya Andrabi to life imprisonment in UAPA case, two associates get 30-year jail terms A Delhi court on Tuesday sentenced Dukhtaran-e-Millat chief Asiya Andrabi to life imprisonment in a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh delivered the order after hearing arguments on the quantum of sentence. Two co-accused, Sofi Fehmeeda and Nahida Nasreen, were also sentenced to 30 years in prison. The three had been convicted earlier on January 14 under UAPA Sections 20, 38, and 39, which address membership of and support to a terrorist organisation. They were also found guilty under several Indian Penal Code (IPC) provisions, including Section 153A (promoting enmity), 153B (prejudicial to national integration), 120B (criminal conspiracy), 505 (public mischief), and 121A (conspiracy against the State). During the sentencing, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) advocated for life imprisonment for Andrabi, arguing that she had waged war against India. The agency emphasized the need to send a clear message that conspiring against the State would result in the harshest penalties. The court’s decision aligns with the NIA’s stance, reflecting the gravity of the charges and the perceived threat posed by the accused. The conviction marks a significant escalation in the legal proceedings against Andrabi and her associates, who were linked to activities related to Kashmir secession. The sentences underscore the Indian government’s approach to addressing cases under the UAPA, which grants authorities broad powers to prosecute individuals involved in terrorism or separatist movements. The ruling also highlights the intersection of national security concerns and legal accountability in cases involving organized dissent.#unlawful_activities_prevention_act #asiya_andrabi #delhi_court #sofi_fehmeeda #nahida_nasreen
Delhi court sentences Kashmiri separatist Asiya Andrabi to life in UAPA case; two associates jailed for 30 years A Delhi court on Tuesday sentenced Asiya Andrabi, a leader of the Dukhtaran-e-Millat separatist group, to life imprisonment under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Her two associates, Fehmeeda and Nasreen, received 30-year sentences in the same case. The conviction followed a trial that began in January 2024, during which Andrabi, Fehmeeda, and Nasreen were found guilty under Sections 20, 38, and 39 of the UAPA, as well as multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including sections 153A, 153B, 120B, 505, and 121A. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had sought life imprisonment for Andrabi, arguing that her activities constituted a "war against India" and that a severe penalty was necessary to deter future conspiracies against the state. During the trial, the court heard arguments on the appropriate quantum of punishment. Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh finalized the sentences after considering the legal and evidentiary framework of the case. According to an interrogation report accessed by The Times of India, Andrabi admitted to maintaining regular contact with former Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his foreign policy adviser Sartaz Aziz. She also disclosed her interactions with officials at the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi, including former ISI chief Hamid Gul, and with UN-designated terrorists Hafiz Saeed and Syed Salahuddin. The report detailed Andrabi’s claims that she had written to Sharif in 2014, expressing frustration over Pakistan’s perceived inaction on the Kashmir issue. Sharif reportedly responded by stating, "We are doing our best.#national_investigation_agency #asiya_andrabi #delhi_court #dukhtaran_e_millat #nawaz_sharif

Separatist Asiya Andrabi Gets Life Term Under Anti-Terror Law UAPA A Delhi court has sentenced Kashmiri separatist Asiya Andrabi to life imprisonment in a case filed under the anti-terror law UAPA. Andrabi, the leader of Dukhataran-e-Millat, was charged with waging war and conspiracy against the nation. The court's decision comes as part of ongoing efforts to address separatist activities in the region. The charges against Andrabi included allegations of planning and executing actions aimed at destabilizing the country. The court cited the UAPA provisions as the basis for the life sentence, emphasizing the severity of the offenses under the law. Legal representatives for the prosecution argued that Andrabi's actions posed a direct threat to national security. The case has drawn attention to the broader implications of the UAPA in addressing separatist movements. Advocacy groups have called for transparency in the application of the law, while authorities maintain that such measures are necessary to combat terrorism. The ruling underscores the legal framework used to prosecute individuals involved in separatist activities. The sentencing follows a prolonged legal process, with multiple hearings held to assess the evidence against Andrabi. The court's decision reflects the gravity of the charges and the state's stance on maintaining territorial integrity. The case is expected to influence future legal proceedings involving similar charges under the UAPA.#kashmir #asiya_andrabi #dukhatarnemillat #uapa #delhi_court