Roshan Anand Accuses Faisal Khan of Murder, Demands Narco Test Roshan Anand, who was released from jail after securing bail, immediately confronted Faisal Khan following his release. Anand alleged that his brother, Prince Yadav, was murdered by Khan and RS Prasad, the owner of Cold Storage. He demanded a narco test to uncover the truth, stating that his brother was killed and that his supporters would now fight for justice. Anand, who was imprisoned in Bihar’s Patna for his involvement in a coaching center dispute, arrived in Saharsa to attend his brother’s final rites. He accused Khan and Prasad of orchestrating a conspiracy to kill Prince Yadav, emphasizing that the case involved a major plot. Anand’s claims come amid ongoing investigations into the murder, which remains unsolved. Faisal Khan, known as Khan Sir, had previously released a video statement expressing deep sorrow over Prince Yadav’s death. He called the incident “extremely tragic” and urged for an impartial, high-level inquiry to uncover the truth. Khan also expressed solidarity with Anand’s family, vowing to support them during this difficult time. However, he raised questions about the circumstances of the murder, urging investigative agencies to thoroughly examine the people present at the time of the incident and their connections. The coaching center dispute, which led to Anand’s imprisonment, began in late May 2026. Khan Global Studies (KGS) accused Roshan Anand, the director of Jnana Bindu, of planning an attack and firing shots at the institute. Based on this complaint, police arrested Anand and others. Meanwhile, the mysterious death of Anand’s brother in Nepal added further complexity to the case, sparking public outrage and demands for transparency.#prince_yadav #roshan_anand #faisal_khan #rs_prasad #khan_global_studies
Journalist Anjana Om Kashyap Files Defamation Suit Against Faisal Khan in Delhi High Court A defamation lawsuit has been filed by journalist Anjana Om Kashyap against Faisal Khan before the Delhi High Court, alleging that his remarks during a public debate on the NEET exam system constituted defamatory content. The case, titled ANJANA OM KASHYAP & ANR v. FAISAL KHAN & ORS, seeks the removal of allegedly harmful material from online social media platforms and compensation of Rs. 2 crore. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a vacation bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna on the day following the filing. The controversy emerged during a live debate focused on the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) system, where Kashyap reportedly criticized online educators, labeling them as "frauds" and "explainers" who prioritize views over academic integrity. Khan, who is referred to as "Khan Sir" in the initial report, allegedly made defamatory comments about Kashyap’s coverage of "star teachers," a term used to describe prominent educators in the online learning space. The lawsuit claims these remarks damaged Kashyap’s professional reputation and warranted legal action. Kashyap’s legal team argues that Khan’s statements were not only false but also targeted her work as a journalist, undermining her credibility in reporting on educational reforms. The case highlights tensions between media professionals and educators in the digital age, particularly regarding the role of online platforms in shaping public discourse. The court will need to determine whether Khan’s remarks crossed the threshold of defamation, which requires proof of false statements, intent to harm, and damage to reputation.#delhi_high_court #khan_sir #anjana_om_kashyap #faisal_khan #neet_exam_system
