Defamation Case: Delhi High Court Refuses Immediate Relief to Anjana Om Kashyap Against Khan Sir The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected a request for interim relief from journalist Anjana Om Kashyap and the TV Today Network in their defamation case against Khan Sir and others. The court directed the respondents to file their response to the petition and scheduled the next hearing for June 17. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, presiding over the case, heard arguments from Kashyap’s legal team, who sought the removal of alleged defamatory content, a ban on future posts, and a compensation of 2 crore rupees. The court, however, declined to grant immediate relief, emphasizing the need for the defense to respond first. The case originated on May 29 when Kashyap, during a show on Aaj Tak, commented on the increasing commercialization of education and the growing influence of online "star teachers." She described the remarks as a legitimate journalistic critique of public issues. Subsequently, from May 30 to June 4, Khan Sir and others allegedly launched a social media campaign against Kashyap and India Today, using derogatory terms like "bikau reporter" (sellable journalist) and "chatukar" (sleazy) and accusing them of running a "fake news shop." The petition names Khan Sir, teacher Abhinay Sharma, Babita Tyagi, Arvind Bhadouria, and several social media handles, along with 4PM News Network, as defendants. Kashyap’s legal team argued that the defendants’ posts and videos spread harmful content, exposing her family to public scrutiny and potential safety risks. They also highlighted that Khan Sir publicly disclosed the name of Kashyap’s child’s school, which they claim had no connection to the dispute.#khan_sir #anjana_om_kashyap #abhinay_sharma #tv_today_network #babita_tyagi
Anjana Om Kashyap Files ₹2 Crore Defamation Case Against Khan Sir and 4PM News in Delhi High Court Anjana Om Kashyap, a prominent journalist and media personality, has filed a defamation case worth ₹2 crore in the Delhi High Court against Khan Sir, 4PM News, and several other defendants. The case, listed for hearing on June 8 before the vacation bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, alleges that the defendants engaged in a coordinated campaign to defame Kashyap and her organization, India Today. The suit seeks the removal of defamatory content, an order to cease further posts, and compensation for damages. The legal action was initiated after Kashyap hosted a debate on Aaj Tak on May 29, 2026, during which she critiqued the growing influence of online "star teachers" and the commercialization of education. She argued that her remarks were part of a fair journalistic discussion on a matter of national importance. However, the suit claims that this sparked a sustained campaign by defendants with significant social media followings, targeting Kashyap and her network between May 30 and June 4. The defendants, including prominent educators like Abhinay Sharma, Babita Tyagi, and Arvind Bhadauriya, as well as X handles and the 4PM News Network, are accused of using abusive and scandalous language to subject Kashyap to insults, ridicule, and public hostility. The suit alleges that these actions were entirely unrelated to any legitimate public debate. Additionally, Khan Sir is specifically named for publicly disclosing information about the school attended by Kashyap’s child, which she claims was irrelevant to the controversy and exposed her family to harassment, unwanted attention, and security risks.#delhi_high_court #khan_sir #anjana_om_kashyap #4pm_news #abhinay_sharma
Journalist Anjana Om Kashyap Files Defamation Suit Against Faisal Khan in Delhi High Court A defamation lawsuit has been filed by journalist Anjana Om Kashyap against Faisal Khan before the Delhi High Court, alleging that his remarks during a public debate on the NEET exam system constituted defamatory content. The case, titled ANJANA OM KASHYAP & ANR v. FAISAL KHAN & ORS, seeks the removal of allegedly harmful material from online social media platforms and compensation of Rs. 2 crore. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a vacation bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna on the day following the filing. The controversy emerged during a live debate focused on the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) system, where Kashyap reportedly criticized online educators, labeling them as "frauds" and "explainers" who prioritize views over academic integrity. Khan, who is referred to as "Khan Sir" in the initial report, allegedly made defamatory comments about Kashyap’s coverage of "star teachers," a term used to describe prominent educators in the online learning space. The lawsuit claims these remarks damaged Kashyap’s professional reputation and warranted legal action. Kashyap’s legal team argues that Khan’s statements were not only false but also targeted her work as a journalist, undermining her credibility in reporting on educational reforms. The case highlights tensions between media professionals and educators in the digital age, particularly regarding the role of online platforms in shaping public discourse. The court will need to determine whether Khan’s remarks crossed the threshold of defamation, which requires proof of false statements, intent to harm, and damage to reputation.#delhi_high_court #khan_sir #anjana_om_kashyap #faisal_khan #neet_exam_system
