Supreme Court Rejects Mahua Moitra's Request to Appear Virtually in Police Station The Supreme Court on Friday rejected the request of TMC MP Mahua Moitra to appear virtually before a police station in a case linked to a controversial Facebook post. The court criticized her for expressing fear of being attacked with eggs after entering politics, drawing a parallel to historical figures who faced greater dangers. The case stems from a police FIR filed against Moitra in June, following allegations that she made inflammatory remarks in two videos posted on social media. The FIR was lodged after a BJP leader accused her of inciting unrest. The incident escalated when BJP supporters allegedly gathered with tomatoes and eggs in Krishnanagar to throw at Moitra, prompting her to seek legal protection. Moitra’s lawyer, Gopal Shankar Narayanan, had argued that she should appear via video conferencing to avoid potential mob attacks. During the Supreme Court hearing, the lawyer cited previous incidents where she faced threats and physical assaults at the police station. However, the court dismissed the plea, emphasizing that Moitra’s fear of eggs was unwarranted given the historical context of political activism. Justice Deepankar Datta and Justice Sheel Nagu, the bench presiding over the case, rejected Moitra’s concerns. Datta remarked, “If you are a politician, why are you afraid of eggs? Our freedom fighters faced bullets in their chests. Such petitions should not even reach the court.” The court also cited a previous order from the Kolkata High Court, which had directed Moitra to appear before the investigating agency on August 14. The Supreme Court clarified that the High Court’s order, specifically Paragraph 19, required Moitra to comply with the directive.#bjp #supreme_court #mahua_moitra #gopal_shankar_narayanan #krishnanagar
Supreme Court Orders Mahua Moitra to Appear in Person Amid Egg-Throwing Case Mahua Moitra, a member of the Trinamool Congress, faced a stern rebuke from the Supreme Court after her legal team requested a virtual appearance in a case involving an incident where she was allegedly thrown eggs at a police station. The court rejected her plea for a remote hearing, criticizing her for seeking leniency and questioning her willingness to confront public dissent. The case stems from an incident in which Moitra, who represents a parliamentary constituency, reported being targeted with eggs during a visit to her local police station. Her lawyer argued that appearing in person could expose her to potential harassment, but the Supreme Court dismissed the request, emphasizing the importance of judicial procedures. The controversy began when Moitra filed a petition seeking exemption from appearing before police authorities in a case related to alleged offenses against religious sentiments. The High Court had previously granted her interim relief, including a stay on her arrest and a directive to cooperate with the investigation. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, stating that her fear of public backlash was not a valid reason to avoid personal appearance. The court’s bench, comprising Justices Deepankar Datta and Sheel Nagu, expressed frustration with her approach, questioning whether a politician could be intimidated by such incidents. Moitra’s legal team had cited the incident of being thrown eggs as a justification for her request, but the Supreme Court dismissed this as an overreach. The judges highlighted that the Constitution guarantees the right to protest and that her case did not warrant special treatment.#high_court #trinamool_congress #supreme_court #mahua_moitra #gopal_shankar_narayanan
