Harish Rana's emotional farewell with family as AIIMS begins passive euthanasia protocol Harish Rana, a man who has been in a coma for 13 years, was recently transferred to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) for the implementation of passive euthanasia protocols. The decision followed a historic ruling by the Supreme Court, which approved the procedure for Rana, whose condition has been deemed irreversible. Rana is currently under the care of palliative specialists at AIIMS’ Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, where medical teams are following established legal and medical guidelines to ensure his comfort during the final stages of his life. The process of passive euthanasia involves the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, such as ventilators or artificial nutrition, while prioritizing pain relief and supportive care. Hospital officials emphasized that the focus is on maintaining the patient’s dignity and quality of life rather than artificially prolonging existence. Rana’s care plan includes regular assessments by medical professionals to monitor his condition and adjust treatment as needed. The family has been actively involved in decision-making, reflecting the legal requirement for consent and ethical considerations in such cases. Passive euthanasia is a highly regulated procedure that requires strict adherence to medical and legal protocols. Doctors at AIIMS stated that the transition from active treatment to palliative care occurs when recovery is no longer possible. This phase is tailored to the patient’s individual needs, addressing physical, psychological, and social aspects of their well-being. The duration of this phase can vary significantly, ranging from days to weeks, depending on the patient’s condition and response to care.#supreme_court #aiims #passive_euthanasia #harish_rana #institute_rotary_cancer_hospital
When med care fails: What SC’s passive euthanasia ruling means #passive_euthanasia #care_fails #med_care #euthanasia_ruling #fails
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia; how it differs from active euthanasia India's Supreme Court has permitted passive euthanasia, reigniting the debate on 'letting die' versus 'active killing'. While passive euthanasia involves withdrawing life support, active euthanasia means deliberately ending life. The court's ruling in the Harish Rana case underscores the complex ethical and legal considerations in end-of-life care, balancing life preservation with patient autonomy and suffering. #Supreme_Court #Supreme #passive_euthanasia #India_Supreme #letting_die #euthanasia_India #active_killing #active_euthanasia #first-ever_passive #permitted_passive
'To be or not to be': Why Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia for the first time #Supreme_Court #Supreme #passive_euthanasia #Court_allowed #allowed_passive
SC allows withdrawal of life support in Harish Rana passive euthanasia case In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has permitted the withdrawal of medical treatment for Harish Rana, a 31-year-old man in a vegetative state. The apex court has instructed Delhi's AIIMS to facilitate the discontinuation of life support for Rana, who has been in this condition for a considerable period. #Supreme_Court #life_support #medical_treatment #Harish_Rana #landmark_decision #vegetative_state #Rana_passive #passive_euthanasia #euthanasia_case #Harish
The Harish Rana Verdict: India’s Fight Over The Right To Die For 13 years, one family fought not to save their son — but to let him go. The Supreme Court of India has now allowed passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, a man who has been in a persistent vegetative state since 2010. The ruling marks a pivotal moment in India’s legal and ethical discourse on end-of-life decisions, granting his family the right to withdraw life-sustaining treatment under strict judicial oversight. The case has reignited debates about the balance between medical intervention, patient autonomy, and the moral responsibilities of families and healthcare providers. Harish Rana’s condition, which left him unable to communicate or respond to his environment, became a focal point for his family’s plea to end his suffering. His parents and siblings argued that prolonging his life in a vegetative state would be an act of cruelty, violating his dignity and the natural course of his life. The court’s decision to permit passive euthanasia — defined as the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment — reflects a recognition of the family’s right to make such a choice, provided it aligns with legal and ethical safeguards. The ruling has sparked polarized reactions across India. Supporters view it as a compassionate acknowledgment of the family’s plight and a step toward respecting individual rights. Critics, however, warn of the risks of legalizing euthanasia, citing fears of misuse, potential for abuse by families, and the erosion of medical ethics. Legal experts have emphasized the need for stringent protocols, including mandatory judicial approval and the involvement of medical professionals, to prevent exploitation of the system.#family #passive_euthanasia #harish_rana #supreme_court_of_india #medical_ethics
